Characterisation of the gSKIN® Heat Flux Sensor

Measurement issues associated with surface mounting of thermopile heat flux sensors

Authors: Sachin K.Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Sameer Khandekar
Published: 19.12.2016
Journal: Applied Thermal Engineering

  • Different mounting possibilities (front/rear, non-/flushed) account for different measurement accuracies

  • Knowing the sensor and substrate properties enables more accurate measurements

  • The percentage error of a measurement can be overcome by in-situ calibration and error analysis

Read the whole paper here.


The study of in-situ measurement method for wall thermal performance diagnosis of existing apartment

Authors: Kim Seohoon , Kim Jonghun, Yoo Seunghwan, Jeong Hakgeun, Song Kyoodong
Published: 19.08.2016
Journal: Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Enviroment

This paper compares different in-situ measurements for the U-value. The paper is peer-reviewed but in korean language. The abstract states that the HFM methode has an error rate of 17% whereas the ASTR methode has an error rate of 20%.

Read the whole paper here.