How to Measure the U-Value: Temperature Based Method vs. Heat Flux Based Method

In a study performed by students at East Bavarian Technical University, the measurement quality of U-values measured with a Temperature Based Method (TBM) versus a Heat Flux Based Method (HFBM) were compared. It was found that the HFBM U-value measurement not only stabilised more quickly, but was also more accurate.

By measuring the U-value of a refrigerator’s insulation wall, it was found that TBM-derived U-value varied with day and night temperature cycles across 41 hours, while the U-value obtained with the U-value Kit stabilised after 12 hours. The report explains the underlying reason for the difference between the two results: A constant convective transfer coefficient is assumed for the TBM, while this coefficient is measured in the HFBM.

View Report

Learn more about U-value measurements: https://www.greenteg.com/U-Value/

More news

Interview at Venturelab: greenTEG and the COVID-19 crisis

Read more

TeleTop interviewed Wulf Glatz (CEO, greenTEG AG) on COVID-19 and how the gSKIN® Fever Temp Patch can help solving our current pandemic

Read more

greenTEG AG offers to sponsor Covid-19 research with its unique fever-monitor

Read more

In Operando Calorimetric Measurements for Electrochemical Capacitors

Read more

COVID-19 ¦ greenTEG global preparedness

Read more

Using gSKIN® heat flux sensors for the calorimetric measurement of batteries

Read more

A heat flux sensor test setup

Read more

Thermal transmittance measurements to analyse deviations between actual and modelled house thermal performance

Read more
Read all