How to Measure the U-Value: Temperature Based Method vs. Heat Flux Based Method

In a study performed by students at East Bavarian Technical University, the measurement quality of U-values measured with a Temperature Based Method (TBM) versus a Heat Flux Based Method (HFBM) were compared. It was found that the HFBM U-value measurement not only stabilised more quickly, but was also more accurate.

By measuring the U-value of a refrigerator’s insulation wall, it was found that TBM-derived U-value varied with day and night temperature cycles across 41 hours, while the U-value obtained with the U-value Kit stabilised after 12 hours. The report explains the underlying reason for the difference between the two results: A constant convective transfer coefficient is assumed for the TBM, while this coefficient is measured in the HFBM.

View Report

Learn more about U-value measurements: https://www.greenteg.com/U-Value/

More news

New research paper on Super-Planckian Radiative Heat Transfer published

Read more

Towards Online Personalized-Monitoring of Human Thermal Sensation Using Machine Learning Approach

Read more

CORE will officially supply Team BORA-hansgrohe in 2021

Read more

greenTEG’s gSKIN® BodyTEMP Patch used in membrane-assisted radiant cooling system study

Read more

greenTEG AG launches COREmedical in the U.S. as a clinical thermometer

Read more

greenTEG at the Tour de France

Read more

Thermal bridge effect of vertical diagonal tie connectors in precast concrete sandwich panels: an experimental and computational study

Read more

greenTEG flies to the International Space Station!

Read more
Read all