How to Measure the U-Value: Temperature Based Method vs. Heat Flux Based Method

In a study performed by students at East Bavarian Technical University, the measurement quality of U-values measured with a Temperature Based Method (TBM) versus a Heat Flux Based Method (HFBM) were compared. It was found that the HFBM U-value measurement not only stabilised more quickly, but was also more accurate.

By measuring the U-value of a refrigerator’s insulation wall, it was found that TBM-derived U-value varied with day and night temperature cycles across 41 hours, while the U-value obtained with the U-value Kit stabilised after 12 hours. The report explains the underlying reason for the difference between the two results: A constant convective transfer coefficient is assumed for the TBM, while this coefficient is measured in the HFBM.

View Report

Learn more about U-value measurements: https://www.greenteg.com/U-Value/

More news

greenTEG wins a grant to develop a new sensing solution for early detection of neurodegenerative diseases.

Read more

greenTEG receives the Seal of Excellence from the EU Horizon 2020 program.

Read more

New method for the thermal characterization of window insulation materials developed

Read more

So messen Sie den U-Wert von Fenstern: Ein Beispiel

Read more

How to measure U-Values of Windows: An example

Read more

greenTEG has a new office address

Read more

Measuring a breathing wall`s effectiveness and dynamic behaviour

Read more

Energieberater ENVISYS testet das gO Mess-System

Read more
Read all